![]() ![]() Is it possible to solve the dichotomy between these different thesis? Can the individual be described only as bearer of egoistic interests or as determined by its membership in a particular social group? The last paragraph tries to deal with these questions, expressing a judgment on the completeness and the normative persuasiveness of these conceptions of the self. With a new foreword by Thomas Nagel, this. As argued in the following pages, these paradigms can be situated on a continuum from the radical individualistic conception of the self proposed by Nozick to the radical communitarian one suggested by Sandel. Winner of the 1975 National Book Award, Anarchy, State and Utopia remains one of the most philosophically rich defenses of economic liberalism to date. 2), and Michael Sandel, one of the main political philosophers of modern-day communitarianism (Cfr. 1), Robert Nozick, one of the main representatives of the libertarian paradigm (Cfr. The publication of Robert Nozicks Anarchy, State and Utopia marked a watershed in the ongoing debate between libertarian defenders of laissez-faire capitalism and their liberal egalitarian adversaries. ![]() Who is an individual? This research paper tries to answer this question by presenting three different conceptions of the self, developed in the XIX century by John Rawls, the leading theorist of the liberal-egalitarian paradigm (Cfr. Finally, I illustrate how the model indexes the nonideal primary goods it justifies to different nonideal contexts and background normative frameworks, illustrating why diverse theorists should find the model and its output principles attractive. §3 then argues that the parties to the model have grounds to seek a variety of remedial social, legal, cultural, and economic ‘nonideal primary goods’ for combating injustice, as well as grounds to distribute these goods in an equitable and inclusive manner. §2 then argues that ‘nonideal fairness’ is best modeled by a nonideal original position adaptable to different nonideal conditions and background normative frameworks (including anti-Rawlsian ones). It then develops a new all-purpose model of ‘nonideal fairness.’ §1 argues that fairness is central to nonideal theory across diverse ideological and methodological frameworks. Winner of the 1975 National Book Award, Anarchy, State and Utopia remains one of the most philosophically rich defenses of economic liberalism to date. This article argues that diverse theorists have reasons to theorize about fairness in nonideal conditions, including theorists who reject fairness in ideal theory. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |